History-Periods
Past eras
From pre-history to today
Choose your period
Periods of History
explore the different eras
Past eras
Choose your period
explore the different eras
In the 1930s, there was a rise in appeasement sentiment in England, driven by a desire to avoid another devastating war like the First World War. Appeasement was the policy of giving in to the demands of aggressive powers in order to avoid conflict. The primary focus of British appeasement policy was Germany, which had been severely punished by the Treaty of Versailles and was rapidly rearming under the leadership of Adolf Hitler.
One of the leading proponents of appeasement was the British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain. Chamberlain believed that by appeasing Germany and meeting some of their demands, he could avoid war and achieve peace in Europe. He famously declared after meeting with Hitler in 1938 that he had secured "peace for our time." However, his appeasement policy ultimately failed when Germany invaded Poland in September 1939, leading to the outbreak of the Second World War.
Other leading proponents of appeasement included Lord Halifax, the British Foreign Secretary, who believed that Germany had legitimate grievances and could be appeased, and Sir Horace Wilson, Chamberlain's chief advisor, who was a strong advocate of appeasement.
There were also critics of appeasement in England, including Winston Churchill, who warned that appeasing Germany would only embolden Hitler and make war more likely in the long run. However, the appeasement sentiment was strong in England and remained popular until the outbreak of war in 1939.
There were several reasons why appeasement became a popular policy in England in the 1930s, and why many people preferred it to confrontation with Germany.
The memory of World War I: The devastation caused by World War I was still fresh in people's minds, and many were reluctant to see another conflict. They feared that another war would lead to even more destruction and loss of life.
Economic concerns: The Great Depression had hit England hard, and many people were struggling financially. They saw war as a threat to their already precarious economic situation.
Pacifist and anti-war sentiment: Many people in England, including politicians and intellectuals, were committed pacifists who believed that war was never the answer. They saw appeasement as a way to avoid war and promote peace.
The belief that Germany had legitimate grievances: Many people in England believed that Germany had been treated unfairly by the Treaty of Versailles, and that some of their demands, such as the return of the German-speaking Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia, were reasonable.
The fear of communism: There was a widespread fear of communism in the 1930s, and many people in England saw Nazi Germany as a bulwark against Soviet expansionism. They believed that appeasing Germany was necessary to prevent the spread of communism.
Military unpreparedness: After the disarmament agreements of the 1920s and 1930s, England was not fully prepared for war. Many people saw appeasement as a way to buy time to rearm and prepare for any future conflict.
Overall, appeasement was a popular policy in England in the 1930s because it offered the promise of peace and stability, and many people believed that it was a better alternative to the horrors of war. However, as events would soon show, appeasement ultimately failed to prevent war and allowed Hitler to expand his territory and increase his military power, ultimately leading to the outbreak of World War II.
There were many people in England who were opposed to the British Government's policy of appeasement towards Nazi Germany in the 1930s. Some of the most prominent critics of appeasement included:
Winston Churchill: Churchill was a vocal opponent of appeasement and argued that it would only embolden Hitler and make war more likely. He was a strong advocate for rearmament and preparing for the possibility of war.
Clement Attlee: Attlee was the leader of the Labour Party and a strong critic of appeasement. He argued that the policy was making war more, rather than less, likely and called for a more assertive stance towards Germany.
George Orwell: Orwell was a journalist and writer who was strongly opposed to appeasement. He argued that the policy was a betrayal of Britain's democratic principles and that the government should stand up to Nazi aggression.
Bertrand Russell: Russell was a philosopher and activist who spoke out against appeasement and called for a more principled approach to foreign policy.
The British public: Despite the popularity of appeasement among some politicians and intellectuals, many ordinary Britons were opposed to the policy. Public opinion polls in the late 1930s showed that a majority of people were in favor of a more assertive stance towards Germany.
These critics of appeasement used a variety of tactics to try to influence public opinion and change government policy. They gave speeches, wrote articles, and published books criticizing the policy of appeasement. They also organized rallies and protests to draw attention to the dangers of Nazi aggression. In some cases, they formed political organizations to challenge the government, such as the Peace Pledge Union, which was founded in 1934 to promote pacifism and oppose rearmament.
Despite their efforts, however, the policy of appeasement remained in place until the outbreak of World War II in 1939.
Winston Churchill is perhaps the most well-known opponent of appeasement in England during the 1930s. Churchill had been a prominent figure in British politics for decades, serving as a Member of Parliament, Cabinet Minister, and even Prime Minister in the 1940s. He had long been critical of the policies of the British Government towards Nazi Germany, arguing that Hitler could not be trusted and that appeasement would only embolden him to become more aggressive.
Churchill's opposition to appeasement was rooted in his belief that Nazi Germany posed a fundamental threat to the security and freedom of Europe. He argued that Hitler's ultimate goal was not simply the redress of grievances, but rather the conquest and domination of the continent. He believed that any policy that sought to appease Hitler would only delay the inevitable conflict and make it more difficult to win in the end.
Churchill was also a strong advocate of rearmament, arguing that the only way to deter Hitler was to build up Britain's military strength. He believed that the government's failure to invest in defense was a serious mistake that would leave the country vulnerable to attack.
Despite his warnings, Churchill was largely ignored by the British Government and dismissed by many of his colleagues as a warmonger. His reputation suffered as a result, and he was largely marginalized in British politics for much of the 1930s.
However, when war finally did break out in 1939, Churchill's warnings were proven correct. He was appointed Prime Minister in May 1940, and led Britain through the darkest days of the war. His leadership and determination were critical in turning the tide of the war and ultimately defeating Nazi Germany.
In retrospect, Churchill's opposition to appeasement is widely regarded as one of the most prescient and courageous acts of political leadership in British history. His foresight and conviction in the face of widespread opposition helped to ensure that Britain was ultimately able to survive and triumph over the forces of tyranny and oppression.
If you have a suggestion regarding additional topics you would like to see included - please let us know
Reference: Article by Greg Scott (Staff Historian), 2024
